Archive for the ‘enterprise systems’ Category

3 Letters That Show A CIO How To Add Value: BPM

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010
Image Credit Can A CIO Help To Find A Better Way To Do Budgets?

Can A CIO Help To Find A Better Way To Do Budgets?

If you’ve spent any time being in a leadership role on a firm, you know that there is one annual task that nobody likes to do – budgeting. It’s a pain in the butt, you’re pretty much just guessing, and the final results never seem to have anything to do with reality. Hey, if everyone thinks this, then is it possible that this is an area where a CIO could step in and make a difference?

What’s Wrong With The Way We Do Budgets Today?

A great deal, actually. In most firms today at the individual department or team level managers create their annual budget using Excel spreadsheets. These spreadsheets are then collected and put together to create division budgets. Once again these are combined to create company budgets. The whole process seems to take forever and is often riddled with inaccuracies.

This whole process takes forever and is seen by everyone doing it as a chore. Once the budget is created, it is as though it was written in stone – it can’t be changed because to do so would take too much effort. Clearly this is not a good situation for any business that wants to think of itself as being dynamic and market driven to be in. Seems like a situation that is ripe for a CIO to step into and lend a helping hand.

Say Hello To Your New Friend: BPM

Business Performance Management (BPM) is a strategy that a company can undertake in order to use management methodologies along with IT technology to create a way to help them ensure that they are meeting their strategic goals. A simpler way of saying the same thing is that BPM allows you to create a real-time budget for the firm.

A BPM enterprise application allows budgets to be entered using web forms by all participants. This automates the process of “flowing upward” the individual budgets into an overall corporate budget. No longer can clever managers hid behind budget numbers and over promise while under delivering. Using a BPM system requires accurate forecasting on everyone’s part.

Welcome To The Real-Time

The use of BPM systems allows a company’s budget to become a much more dynamic real-time tool that can be constantly changing as you move throughout the business year. The use of both automated dashboards and scorecards allows individuals throughout the organization to see how they are doing relative to their budget at any point in time.

Once a company gets use to having a dynamic budget they’ll start to discover the other advantages of having a BPM solution such as having instant access to operational analytics.

Careful Does It

Although CIOs can quickly see how important a BPM system can be to a company, they need to move very carefully. It is all too easy to get caught up in the planning and execution details of implementing a major enterprise application and forget about the people involved.

Moving to a BPM solution requires a great deal of change within a company. CIOs need to understand that not everyone embraces change as easily as IT pros do. Instead of changing everything in one fell swoop, it is generally a much better idea to make a series of smaller changes. This allows a new way of doing business to be introduced gradually and gives the end users a chance to get use to how things are being done before more changes occur.

What All Of This Means For You

As CIO you always need to be on the prowl to identify ways that the IT organization can help the rest of the company use technology to operate quicker and better. Automating the annual budgeting process using a BPM solution is one way to accomplish this.

A BPM solution will allow web technologies to be used to enter individual budgets and will allow multiple budgets to easily be combined into a single corporate budget. Once a budget has been created, it can be monitored in real-time using dashboards and scoreboards.

CIOs need to take into consideration the human side of any such large-scale change. There will be resistance to such an automation project. However, the CIO who takes the time to understand worker’s concerns and then slowly rolls out the new system will win over the staff and just might single handedly make the company run a lot smoother.

- Dr. Jim Anderson
Blue Elephant Consulting –
Your Source For Real World IT Department Leadership Skills™

Question For You: Do you think that a company would know what to do with a real-time budget if they had one or is this beyond their skills?

Click here to get automatic updates when The Accidental Successful CIO Blog is updated.

P.S.: Free subscriptions to The Accidental Successful CIO Newsletter are now available. Learn what you need to know to do the job. Subscribe now: Click Here!

What We’ll Be Talking About Next Time

One of the biggest challenges that you are going to be facing when you become a CIO is managing an IT workforce that is made up of multiple generations. Each has its own set of views and skills, and yet you have to somehow come up with ways that they can work together. How hard could that be?

Breakthrough IT Strategy: Take A New "Path" To Success

Monday, July 21st, 2008

Shinsei Bank Used Paths To Implement Successful Enterprise IT Projects

Businesses today spent roughly 5% of their gross revenue on IT and end up with very little to show for it. A couple of very bright guys over at the Harvard Business School (David Upton and Bradley Staats) have come up with a new approach to Enterprise IT Projects. They started their research from Eric Raymond‘s (programmer / open source champion) point-of-view: most IT projects are built using the Cathedral Approach:

  • they cost a lot,
  • they take a really long time to create,
  • and they only start to deliver any value after they are all done.

The Harvard guys believe that they have come up with a different approach that slashes costs while at the same time boosting the existing business and even making it easier to launch new ones. Sound interesting? Read on!

The new IT strategy is called the “path” approach. It assumes that there is no way that you can define all of a system’s specifications at the start of a project and so instead you just focus on laying out a path for the system to be further developed over time.

As a proof that this approach works, they studied the Shinsei Bank which is a a Japanese bank. In 1998 Shinsei was in a bad spot: it had had gone bust and (due to bad loans — sound familiar?) sold to the U.S. private equity firm Ripplewood Holdings. The very smart guys at Ripplewood got Masamoto Yashiro (former chairman of Citigroup Japan) to be the CEO of this struggling bank. Yashiro decided that Sinsei needed to compete based on a strong IT department. Here’s how they used a path-based approach to do it:

  1. Instead of implementing a new “big bang” set of business software, they took a different approach. They build a modular infrastructure that would allow them to put pieces in as needed.

  2. They build new systems that mimicked the old existing systems that the bank was already using. This allowed them to switch folks over to the new system and then make gradual improvements without requiring extensive retraining.
  3. They helped to ensure that the IT department was integrated with Sinsei’s business strategy by having the CIO report directly to the CEO. Note that this is different from many U.S. firms where the CIO reports to the CFO and is effectively “hidden” from the CEO.
  4. The Sinsei business unit heads spend a lot of time learning to “talk IT”. This helps to break down internal communication barriers.
  5. Sinsei IT application development projects start by focusing on the foreseeable business objectives — not the existing business environment. In other words, they think about how they want things to work, not about how they can automate how things currently work. The IT strategy is then built to meet this forecasted future.
  6. This is key: the Sinsei business folks tell IT what they need. IT creates prototypes and has the business side use them. This causes feedback and new possible solutions are identified.

Finally, the Harvard boys identified three characteristics of a path based IT solution that will allow it to succeed:

  • Use a minimal set of standards: pick a few and stay with them. This will reduce costs and simplify the entire project.

  • Create Simple Reusable Solutions: This can be as simple as taking each IT problem, breaking it down as far as it can possibly go, and then implementing solutions to those individual problems. When the low-level problems are connected together you’ll have a flexible solution that can be easily adjusted if any component changes.
  • Create Solutions With Modularity, Not Just Modules: Getting back to the original definition of modules, this simply means that you can tinker inside of one module without impacting any of the other modules that make up a complete solution. A good example of this is to create a solution that can be rolled out in phases. This limits your risk, allows users to get used to the new business software, and allows time for changes to be made.

The Harvard boys conclude their study with one final note of caution: if you want to build on what you’ve accomplished with an IT project, then you need to ensure that you have the committed involvement of your end-users. Otherwise you can expect to fail. In the end, the Shinsei bank is doing quite well due in part to its strong IT department. The realization that most large IT projects end up failing due to internal resistance instead of any technology issues, the path based approach to IT projects has allowed Shinsei to completely re-invent itself.

Tags: enterprise systems, IT, Shinsei Bank, modular software, CIO

When Opportunity Comes Knocking: Getting Real Value From Enterprise Systems

Tuesday, June 17th, 2008

Enterprise Systems Open Door Of Opportunity For CIOs
The good folks over at Accenture have started running some ads that are asking companies to take a long term look at the value of those really big IT projects such as CRM systems and other enterprise systems. They make a really good point that lots of companies are doing the work, but missing the point. To quote from their ad:

Companies often neglect to factor in business strategy when putting an enterprise system in place, says Kevin Carnahan, managing director of system integration for Accenture in San Francisco. Often companies err by focusing on getting software installed, but they miss the opportunity to get the analytics and the forward-looking information enterprise systems can provide, he adds. “They may get systems working in a way that keeps the business operating. That has a fundamental value, but companies need to take the extra step to transform transaction-level data into action-oriented metrics that enable management decisions.”

Elsewhere in the ad/article, they point out that the Accenture Institute for High Performance Business conducted two studies, four years apart, to examine the practices that enable companies to get more value out of their investments in enterprise systems. The studies consistently showed that senior executives’ top priority for their systems is to obtain better information for decision making. Hmm, this sounds like a job for the CIO and the IT team!

Having lived though several implementations of these types of systems, I can attest to the fact that just getting them in place and working is a bear of a task. Most of the firms that I’ve worked for have been so exhausted by the process, that they have pretty much stopped here. After all, there really aren’t a lot of stories about companies that have leveraged their enterprise systems to become more competitive. Just lots of disaster stories about when implementation projects go off track. As CIOs and IT departments strive to find new roles to replace the operations ones that are going away, it sure looks like using the enterprise systems to answer questions for the rest of the business is a great way to show value for the department.

How would one actually go about doing this? Well basically we are talking about collecting copious amounts of data and then further processing it in order to detect trends and spot abnormalities. The collection and processing tasks are well suited to the IT shop. There’s a good chance that the data will have to be cleaned and the output of the processing will have to be analyzed in order to ensure that you are not getting good looking garbage numbers.

Both of these tasks are not well suited for any other part of the company to perform. It will require a reorganization of the IT department and a retraining of the CIO so that he/she can present the results of the analysis in a way that matches how the business teams see the world. Additionally, the CIO will be feedback loop that brings requests for further analysis back to the IT team. Welcome to a brave new world — that’s opportunity that you hear knocking!