<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t We All Just Get Along (In IT)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/it-strategy/cant-we-all-just-get-along-in-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/it-strategy/cant-we-all-just-get-along-in-it</link>
	<description>The Premier Blog For Learning How To Become A Successful CIO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf Rivkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/it-strategy/cant-we-all-just-get-along-in-it/comment-page-1#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf Rivkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/?p=380#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Jim. of course. This Business/IT alignment is not only crucial but is practically achievable as well. 

To show that we are able not only to call for it on every street corner but to actually, practically achieve it, I have recently published a paper on the issue: Closing the Business-IT Gap Once And For All (http://www.bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/closing-the-business-it-gap-once-and-for-all.html). It is trying to show that some things are actually easier done than said (if one knows what he is doing, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim. of course. This Business/IT alignment is not only crucial but is practically achievable as well. </p>
<p>To show that we are able not only to call for it on every street corner but to actually, practically achieve it, I have recently published a paper on the issue: Closing the Business-IT Gap Once And For All (<a href="http://www.bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/closing-the-business-it-gap-once-and-for-all.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/closing-the-business-it-gap-once-and-for-all.html</a>). It is trying to show that some things are actually easier done than said (if one knows what he is doing, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jim Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/it-strategy/cant-we-all-just-get-along-in-it/comment-page-1#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jim Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/?p=380#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Wolf: Which goes to show that if you keep the IT team locked up in their own private department, then you&#039;ll never be able to align the information processing tasks with how the business actually operates. As always, this is easy to say, but very, very hard to do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolf: Which goes to show that if you keep the IT team locked up in their own private department, then you&#8217;ll never be able to align the information processing tasks with how the business actually operates. As always, this is easy to say, but very, very hard to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf Rivkin</title>
		<link>http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/it-strategy/cant-we-all-just-get-along-in-it/comment-page-1#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf Rivkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaccidentalsuccessfulcio.com/?p=380#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Not until we come to a common, consistent understanding of our job. The Technology of Information Processing is a plain field, which should and will be standardized, commoditized, and left to IT Technicians. You may discuss it with whomever you want, because it does not contain a competitive edge anymore.

The Methodology of Information Processing, including EA, BP, etc., to the contrary, is very important and might (actually should) contain a competitive edge. So, correct understanding of it inside the whole Enterprise (not just IT) is crucial both for the company business success and for the CIO, who wants to become knowledgeably and consistently, rather than accidentally, successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not until we come to a common, consistent understanding of our job. The Technology of Information Processing is a plain field, which should and will be standardized, commoditized, and left to IT Technicians. You may discuss it with whomever you want, because it does not contain a competitive edge anymore.</p>
<p>The Methodology of Information Processing, including EA, BP, etc., to the contrary, is very important and might (actually should) contain a competitive edge. So, correct understanding of it inside the whole Enterprise (not just IT) is crucial both for the company business success and for the CIO, who wants to become knowledgeably and consistently, rather than accidentally, successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

