Posts Tagged ‘business opportunity’

« Older Entries

Faux Market Secrets: How CIOs Capture Innovation

Monday, July 13th, 2009
CIOs Can Use Faux Markets To Identify Innovative Ideas

CIOs Can Use Faux Markets To Identify Innovative Ideas

So picture this: you’re a CIO and you desperately want to be seen by the rest of the C-level executives as something more than a simple cost center. What to do? If only there was some way that you could tap into all of that incredible creative energy that we all know lives in the IT department.

If you could harness that energy and apply it to innovative projects, you’d be a company hero. Guess what? The power of Faux Markets is exactly what you need to do this…

What Is A Faux Market?

You know that things are getting fancy when we start using French words! A Faux Market is simply a term that refers to using simulated market forces to make a decision. Perhaps an example would show what I mean. A good case study would be GE Research.

Back in 2005 GE Research had a problem. They had too many product ideas that had been submitted and only $50,000 to spend on investigating them. Clearly they need to make some hard decisions as to which ones they would persure.

The way they picked which projects to work on was by using a faux market. They had their 85 employees spend three weeks buying and selling any one of 62 proposed projects. At the end of the three weeks, GE ended up with a  prioritized list of the top projects that its employees thought had the most value. The project that won was an machine intelligence algorithm that a researcher had proposed but which had not yet traveled through the normal management bureaucracy.

Why Use Faux Markets?

All too often IT departments have a bewildering array of possible projects, technologies, or directions that the department can choose. Sometimes senior management will huddle and make a decision, sometimes no decision gets made. Faux markets offer an alternative.

A faux market tool allows a firm to quickly sort though large numbers of projects or proposals in order to attempt find those that will provide the most bang for the buck. Firms believe that this approach offers them the best chance of finding the next blockbuster product or solution.

Not A Silver Bullet

Faux markets can be a big help; however, as with everything else they do have their drawbacks. One such drawback is the that the voting process does not provide much insight - there may be no penalty for backing a bad idea. Just because a proposal is popular does not necessarily guarantee commercial success.

Final Thoughts

Using faux market tools to quickly sort though a large stack of ideas can provide IT departments with a way to identify innovative ideas no matter where they come from. However, a group vote alone isn’t enough in most cases.

A two step process where voting is initially used to narrow a large list down into a more manageable list of less than 100 candidates is a good first step. The next step can be to use a prediction market allow employees to buy and sell the candidates in order to see which ones go up in value. This will reveal the true winning ideas and you will have found a way to apply IT to enable the rest of the company to grow quicker, move faster, and do more.

Questions For You

How do you process new idea suggestions today? Do you have employees vote on things in order to sort them out? Are these just popularity contests or do they take market factors into consideration? Do you think that faux markets could help you capture more innovative ideas? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Click here to get automatic updates when The Accidental Successful CIO Blog is updated.

What We’ll Be Talking About Next Time

As a CIO, you’ve got some challenges facing you. You’re managing a diverse and potentially distributed work force of highly skilled and talented IT professionals. You need to find a way to keep them challenged, and yet at the same time enable them to find ways to work together. Have you considered Alternate Reality Games?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in business opportunity | No Comments »

First-Mover Advantage: Complex-Event Processing Is What CIOs Need

Monday, June 22nd, 2009
CIOs Need To Get To Know Complex-Event Processing

CIOs Need To Get To Know Complex-Event Processing

The job of  a CIO and the IT department is to equip the rest of the company to move faster and do more. One of the ways that a CIO can do this is by staying on top of new and emerging technologies (ex. unified communications).

If such technologies can be implemented in a useful way BEFORE the company’s competitors can do the same, then the CIO will have done his/her job. Complex-Event Processing looks like it may be another one of those technologies.

What Is “Complex-Event Processing”?

In business, knowledge is power and power is profit. Every business has multiple streams of information flowing into it at all times. Information on sales, inventory, returns, web site clicks, weather conditions, bank balances, etc.

For years firms have been processing these information streams individually and in near-real-time. These are the core business applications that produce the reports that get sent to senior management each night for them to review the next day. This is better than nothing, but it’s not quite enough.

Neal Leavitt writing in the IEEE’s Computer magazine points out that today’s traditional databases are not up to the task of analyzing continuous streams of business data in real-time searching for complex events (events that require more than one data stream to detect).

What is now arriving on the IT scene are general-purpose platforms that provide an IT department with enough processing horsepower to analyze real-time business information simultaneously across multiple business applications.

What’s It Good For?

Complex-event processing gives a firm the ability to spot interconnected business trends and patterns in real-time and then combine this information into complex events that can trigger alerts that can be sent to people in the company.

Complex events can include such things as determining when to trade stocks, detecting fraud as it is happening, spotting inventory issues before they become a problem, network status monitoring, etc.

Are There Any Risks?

Of course – this is cutting edge technology, there are always risks with this stuff. The current limitations to this type of technology include:

  • Lack Of Standards: specifically for the event-pattern detection and rule-based languages for different vendor’s products.
  • Education: this is new technology and businesses don’t fully understand what the products can do nor all of the situations in which they can be applied.
  • Missing Benchmarks: No standardized benchmarks currently exist so it’s difficult to compare products.

Final Thoughts

Every great business break-through starts with a dream. What could your firm do if you could analyze all of your business data streams in real-time? If the benefit is compelling enough, then perhaps it’s time to start looking into how you could apply complex-event processing to as a way to apply IT to enable the rest of the company to grow quicker, move faster, and do more.

Additional Resources

If you’re interested, here are links to several vendors who have products in the complex-event processing. I have no relationship with any of them so there is no order to the list:

Questions For You

Does your firm have multiple streams of real time data flowing into it? What do you do with these streams today?  What kind of delay is there from when the data arrives to when staff can take action on it? What could you do with the ability to analyze this data in real-time? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Click here to get automatic updates when
The Accidental Successful CIO Blog is updated.

What We’ll Be Talking About Next Time

If you could be running the IT department for any company out there right now, which one would it be? A lot of us would say Google – everything that we’ve read and heard about the company makes it seem like a great place to work. However, it turns out that even Google is not immune to IT staff problems…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in technologies | 3 Comments »

Why Don’t IT Alliances Work Out?

Monday, April 20th, 2009

IT Department Alliances Can Make Everyone Stronger - If They Are Done Correctly

IT Department Alliances Can Make Everyone Stronger - If They Are Done Correctly

You would think that the more alliances that your company / IT department makes with other firms, then the better that they would become at making them. After all, practice makes perfect – doesn’t it? It turns out that this is not always the case.

Koen Heimeriks has spent time studying 200 firms that had formed more than 3,400 alliances. What he has found just might surprise you.

He found that those firms that had the most experience striking up alliances actually had worse results when compared to those firms who had moderate experience.

Why the difference? It turns out that there are two problems that develop in firms that already have  a number of alliances:

  1. they have a tendency to become overconfident in their alliance building skills, and
  2. they can develop learnings about alliances that are in actuality based on unsupported ideas about cause and effect.

So what can make an IT department’s alliance with another firm actually work out well? It turns out that it’s the methods and procedures that the firm uses to create alliances that will determine their eventual success. Established firms that already have many alliances will probably have rigid and inflexible business processes for making decisions and selecting partners.

However, IT departments with fewer existing alliances will have more flexibility built into their processes. An example of this would be where employees who have worked on previous alliances share information with the employees who are trying to create a new alliance. This type of discussion can lead to experimentation and allows novel approaches to each alliance opportunity.

So in the end, what does all of this lead to? Heimeriks reports that the larger firms who had many alliances and a more rigid alliance creation process had an alliance success rate of around 50%. Those firms that had fewer alliances and a more flexible alliance creation process had an alliance success rate of around 71%. Sure looks like flexible processes are the key to successful IT alliances!

Does your IT department have any alliances with outside firms? Would you say that you have a lot or a few of these alliances? Are they generally successful or not so successful? Do you feel that your alliance creation processes are fixed or flexible? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in process | 2 Comments »

When Giving IT Information, More Is Better

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009
Providing Data About Data Can Make Data Even More Valuable To A Company

Providing Data About Data Can Make Data Even More Valuable To A Company

So just what is the job of an IT department once you get past the keeping the network up and applications running stuff? I think that we can all agree that it must have something to do with the company’s data, but exactly what does that mean?

Ranjay Gulati, James Oldroyd, and Phanish Puranam are three researchers who have been studying this problem and they’ve made some interesting discoveries. They realize that IT is the source for countless reports – our job is to turn data into information that the company can take action on. However, they’ve discovered that it can be just as important that we share with the rest of the company HOW we’ve come to know something as well as WHAT we know.

Now this is the tricky part: IT needs to find ways to tell our audience the answers to their questions AND we need to tell them how we got the data and what, if any, strengths and weakness there are with that data.

If you want to get all fancy about this the word to use would be that we need to provide “metadata” with our reports. A good example of this would come from the Royal Bank of Canada.

A few years ago the bank implemented a system that when a customer was overdrawn on a check, the system would do some credit / overdraft history checking in order to determine if a courtesy overdraft should be granted.

The information on the system and the data that it used was distributed in the bank and an ATM product manger happened to read it. He realized that a similar system could be created to provide overdrafts for ATM customers. The bank spent about $100,000 to implement this new service and since then has made millions off of it.

Allowing staff to not only see the output of an IT department, but also the information on the data that was used to create that output allows more people to find ways to reapply the data in ways that you may have never thought of.

When your IT department produces reports, do they include any information on the data that they used to create the report? Has anyone ever been able to use this “metadata” to identify a new use for the data? Was that new use valuable to the company? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in information | 2 Comments »

How To Drive An IT Department Into The Ground

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

Seven Things That An IT Department Needs To Avoid In Order To Be Successful

Seven Things That An IT Department Needs To Avoid In Order To Be Successful

You can go just about anywhere on the web or in your local bookstore and find ways to make your IT department a success. However, clearly this is not an easy thing to do when you take a moment to consider how much time that we spend trying to be successful.

What’s missing from all of this is that you need to understand how people have failed at this task in order to understand what you need to do in order to succeed. How about if we take a look at some of the classic ways that IT departments have failed big time?

  • Fake Synergies: All companies love this one – let’s merge with someone who has complementary strengths in order to grow. However, this rarely seems to work for IT departments. Sometimes synergies do actually exist; however, this can be even worse because it can cause an IT department to head off in the wrong direction. Getting access to new customers or delivery systems can seem like a good idea, until AFTER the merger.
  • Questionable Financial Engineering: We’ve all see this one show up at the end of a quarter or a fiscal year. Getting aggressive in how accounting is done won’t necessarily land someone (you) in jail, but it can cause you some sleepless nights. The two big problems that getting creative with your company / department’s financing is that they can cause you to believe in a product that is less than perfect and they can cause you to take on more risk – a move that the current downturn shows can be very risky.
  • Sticking With A Strategy Too Long: Tenacity has long been considered to be a key asset of IT leaders. However, if you are going in the wrong direction in the first place, then this can lead to disaster. There is a secret at work here: the reason that IT departments don’t change course is because the economics of doing things the new way don’t measure up to the economics of doing things the old way.
  • “It’s Just A Step To The Left”: Often companies and IT departments decide that they need to try to sell new products to their existing customers or maybe through new channels (sometimes called an “adjacent-market” strategy). However, sometimes this is a bad idea that can bring down a department. You can tell that this is a bad idea if you are considering  making this move not because it’s a good business opportunity, but rather because your core business is having problems.
  • Selecting The Wrong Technology: This one we all should recognize – betting on BetaMax when VHS ends up winning.
  • Consolidating Too Quickly: All too often companies rush to consolidate when markets are maturing and the number of companies in the market start to shrink. Keeping in mind that when you buy a company you not only get its IT department, but you also get all of the problems that come along with it.

An IT department is just a part of a larger organization. However, both the company and the IT department are responsible for the overall success of the company. If you can avoid making these mistakes then you will that much closer to being successful!

Have you ever worked at a company that made any of the mistakes that we’ve discussed? Could you see that there were going to be problems from the beginning or did that only show up later on? What did the company try to do when problems started showing up? Did it help to address the problems? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

« Older Entries