Posts Tagged ‘offshore outsourcing’

Satyam Scandal: CIOs Need To Talk With Their CFOs

Monday, June 29th, 2009
Fraud At Satyam Means That How CIOs Do Outsourcing Needs To Be Rethought

Fraud At Satyam Means That How CIOs Do Outsourcing Needs To Be Rethought

Didn’t we solve that whole outsourcing thing years ago? Specifically aren’t the IT and the Finance departments on the same page when it comes to not only IF we should outsource some of the IT work, but also HOW it should be outsourced? If this is true, than what does the Satyam scandal mean for your IT / Finance relationship?

The Satyam Scandal

Just in case there is anyone out there who doesn’t know what happened at Satyam, perhaps a quick review is in order. Satyam Computer Services is based in India, has a work force of 53,000 and operations in 66 countries. They were very successful and served more than a third of the U.S. Fortune 500 companies.

Back in January the then CEO of Satyam, Ramalinga Raju, revealed that he and his CFO had been conducting a massive fraud – they significantly inflated its earnings and assets for years. Basically they were losing money hand over foot. In January they revealed that 50.4 billion rupees, or $1.04 billion, of the 53.6 billion rupees in cash and bank loans the company listed as assets for its second quarter, which ended in September, were nonexistent. Poof!

Impact Of The Fraud

What this means for firms that do outsourcing business with Satyam is that the firm might fold any day (perhaps you are one of these firms!). All of a sudden, outsourcing contracts that had appeared to be solid now seem to be not so solid. Most firms that outsource their work don’t necessarily have a good contingency plan for what to do if their outsourcing partner is suddenly unable to perform the work.

What Needs To Be Done

The Satyma scandal should serve as a wake-up call to CIOs everywhere. Oursourcing can never be done the same as it’s been done in the past. Here’s what needs to change:

  • Finance Needs To Play A Role: the IT department is responsible for making sure that the outsourcing company has the needed technical skills, but the Finance department needs to play a bigger role to make sure that the outsourcing firm can stay in business over time.
  • More Baskets For Your Eggs: it’s time to start to diversify your outsourcing activities in order to lower your risk profile. Detailed technical work needs to be moved around every so often so that not just one vendor knows how to do the work.
  • Update Your Contracts: create shorter contracts that are more flexible. Make sure that you are not tied to a given outsourcer for too long just in case things start to go wrong – you might want to move your work to another outsourcer quickly.

Final Thoughts

India has now had their version of Enron / Worldcom. Hopefully it will serve as a wakeup call for all CIOs who outsource their work that greater due diligence needs to be done even as the world continues to move faster. By working more closely with Finance, CIOs can apply IT to enable the rest of the company to grow quicker, move faster, and do more.

Questions For You

When you selected an outsourcer, did you do a detailed financial due diligence on them? Was your finance department involved? Has your finance department remained involved in evaluating the health of your outsourcer(s)? Do you have a contingency plan in place that you could us if your outsourcer went out of business? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Click here to get automatic updates when
The Accidental Successful CIO Blog is updated.

What We’ll Be Talking About Next Time

Data Security. There I said it. It sorta lays there like a big lump of coal and everyone in the company stands around looking at it wondering who’s responsibility it is to do something about it.

Nobody, including CIOs really wants to touch it for one very simple reason: it’s a losing proposition

Cha-Cha Change Coming To IT In The Form Of Outsourcing?

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008
Shell Just Outsourced Most Of Its IT Department - Are You Next?

Shell Just Outsourced Most Of Its IT Department - Are You Next?

I just happened to run across an interesting article in Baseline magazine awhile back that pointed out a very interesting trend in IT that just might impact all of us. The good folks over at Royal Dutch Shell (the world’s 3rd biggest oil company) have just announced a massive outsourcing deal with EDS/HP. They appear to have gotten rid of just about all of their IT shop – lock, stock, and barrel. If they can outsource their entire IT shop, why can’t your shop be outsourced completely also?

We like to talk about how to go about aligning IT with the rest of the business so that IT can play a strategic role in the company’s success. Well, if you outsource all of IT that’s not going to be happening any time soon! Shell appears to have gotten rid of the parts of IT that have nothing to do with being an oil company. The following description of just exactly what is being outsourced comes from the press release about this deal:

The activities in scope of outsourcing include designing, building, maintaining and operating the IT infrastructure, and cover the desktop and laptop computers, the telephone and handheld devices, the shared servers for running the applications that support business processes, the storage for data, and the networks and bandwidth for data and voice transmission. The infrastructure services enable Shell companies to use applications that support their business processes and goals, and enable staff and contractors for teamwork across the enterprise, whatever their location, including offshore sites and some of the world’s most remote areas.

What this means for folks in IT is that all of the day-to-day IT effort of keeping the network up and running has been outsourced. No need for DBAs, help desks, or Cisco certified folks anymore.

The Shell CIO, Alan Matula, has told the press that the real objective of the outsourcing deal was to allow the company to focus on its core business operations. Hmm, that does not sound like good news for those who work in any part of IT that can be considered to not be part of the “core”!

Although this is just one deal, and it’s being done by a multinational firm so the impacts won’t be felt in just one country but rather in multiple countries, I still think that this is a big deal. In effect, Shell said “enough is enough” to increasing IT costs that sure didn’t seem to be providing any bottom line value back to the company. Oh oh, now that one big company has done this, what’s to stop everyone else from doing the same thing?

I think that we are seeing the natural progression of outsourcing. Companies have now become so comfortable with what it means to outsource a function and the firms that they outsource to that they are willing to outsource any IT function that is not a part of what makes them competitive in their market.

This is now and will always be a role for the part of IT that is developing the competitive tools that a firm needs to leap-frog its competition. Google’s search engine, Ebay’s auction platform, and Pixar’s design tools will always be developed by in-house IT staff because they define the company. However, all the rest can probably be done better by someone else.

This means that CIOs are going to have to get better at managing outsourced operations because they are still responsible for the results. Additionally, IT managers are going to have to learn how to work with outsourcing shops in order to complete the projects that they have been given. It’s a brave new world out there: get in, buckle up, and let’s go!

How much of your IT operations have been outsourced so far? Are you planning on outsourcing more of it? What parts of IT would you say are mission critical to the rest of the firm? Do you manage differently now that you realize that parts of your operation may be going away? Leave a comment and let me know what you are thinking.